Social Identity, Identity Complexity, and Synodality: An Interfaith Study in the Context of Religious Moderation in Indonesia

Authors

  • Yongki Saputra Sekolah Tinggi Agama Katolik Negeri Pontianak Author
  • Juliana Sriana Sinaga Sekolah Tinggi Agama Katolik Negeri Pontianak Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70343/nnj6jh07

Keywords:

moderasi beragama, identitas sosial, kompleksitas identitas, dialog lintas iman, sinodalitas

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dynamics of interfaith relations in Indonesia by integrating Social Identity Theory (SIT), Social Identity Complexity (SIC), and Pope Francis' synodality. The focus of the study is to understand how social identity categories, identity intersections, and the synodal vision of communion, participation, and mission can enrich the paradigm of religious moderation in a pluralistic society. This study uses qualitative methods with a literature review and content analysis approach to identity theory, empirical findings on interfaith tolerance, and Catholic Church documents. The study was conducted by exploring the key concepts of SIT and SIC, examining social practices of tolerance in the Indonesian context, and describing the pastoral relevance of synodality as a dialogical approach. The results of the study show that religious moderation can develop when religious communities have a natural meeting space, build flexible social identity intersections, and actively engage in mutual listening dialogue as emphasized in the 2021–2023 Synod process. In this context, synodality provides a theological framework for the Church to foster inclusive, creative, and transformative relationships, so that each religion can display its uniqueness in diversity without losing the spirit of brotherhood.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bergstrom, V. N. Z. (2023). The Utility of Social Identity Interventions for Reducing Interfaith Prejudice in the United States by The Utility of Social Identity Interventions for Reducing Interfaith Prejudice in the United States.

Bergstrom, V. N. Z., & Chasteen, A. L. (2025). Interfaith prejudice in the United States : The role of social identity complexity. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/00846724241309922

Brown, R. (2020). Henri Tajfel: Explorer of Identity and Difference. Routledge.

Bukhori, B., Abraham, J., & Muttaqin, D. (2024). The Dynamics of Relationship between Religious Identity and Fundamentalism in Predicting Muslim Prejudice against Christian in Indonesia. 7.

Datu, W. S. K., & Yuswanto, F. (2024). Menjaga harmoni dalam penerapan moderasi beragama di sekolah. 8–16.

Fransiskus. (2013). Evangelii Gaudium. Dokumentasi dan Penerangan KWI,

Fransiskus. (2020). Fratelli Tutti. Dokumentasi dan Penerangan KWI,.

George, M. W. (2008). The elements of library research: What every student needs to know. Princeton University Press.

Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social Identity Theory and Self-categorization Theory : A Historical Review. 1, 204–222.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237.

Turner, J. C. (1982). Intergroup Processes. Cambridge University Press.

Paulus VI. (1965). Nostra Aetate. In Dokumen Konsili Vatikan II.

Yuniarto, Y. J. W., Krismawanto, A. H., & Setiyaningtiyas, N. (2023). Merefleksikan Kembali Toleransi Bagi Kebersamaan Yang Pluralistik Antar Manusia. 6, 397–411.

Yuswanto, F. (2012). Agama dan Toleransi Beragama Pascakonversi Agama. 117–129.

Published

2025-12-01

How to Cite

Saputra, Y., & Sinaga, J. S. (2025). Social Identity, Identity Complexity, and Synodality: An Interfaith Study in the Context of Religious Moderation in Indonesia. PASTORAL CATECHETICAL JOURNAL, 2(2), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.70343/nnj6jh07

Similar Articles

1-10 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.