Application of the Due Diligence Model to Improve Student Learning Achievement in Catholic Religious Education Lessons for Class XI Students of SMK Negeri 3 Jayapura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70343/5hep3z28Keywords:
Model Pengajaran Tuntas, Prestasi Belajar, Pendidikan Agama Katolik, Ajaran Sosial GerejaAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the completed teaching model in improving students' understanding of church social teaching materials. The completed teaching model is implemented through an approach that ensures each student reaches the expected level of understanding before moving on to the next material. This study used a quantitative method with an experimental design. Data were collected through learning achievement tests, classroom observations, and interviews with students and teachers. The results showed a significant increase in students' learning achievement after the implementation of the completed teaching model. Students showed a deeper understanding of church social teachings and were able to apply the knowledge in the context of daily life. In addition, this model also increased students' learning motivation and active participation in the learning process. Thus, the due diligent teaching model is proven effective in improving students' learning achievement in Catholic Religious Education and Cultivation subjects. The recommendation of this research is that the model can be adopted more widely in other subjects to improve the quality of education in schools.
Downloads
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineksa Cipta.
Combs. Arthur. W. 1984. The Profesional Education of Teachers. Allin and Bacon, Inc. Boston.
Dahar, R.W. 1989. Teori-teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1994. Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Proses Belajar Mengajar, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri. 2002. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineksa Cipta.
Djamarah. Syaiful Bahri. 2000. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineksa Cipta.
Hamalik, Oemar. 1994. Metode Pendidikan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Hamalik,Oemar. 2000. Psikologi Belajar dan Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.
Kemmis, S. dan Mc. Taggart, R. 1988. The Action Research Planner. Victoria Dearcin University Press.
Margono. 1997. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineksa Cipta.
Ngalim, Purwanto M. 1990. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nur, Moh. 2001. Pemotivasian Siswa untuk Belajar. Surabaya. University Press. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Poerwodarminto. 1991. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Bina Ilmu.
Purwanto, N. 1988. Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknis Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Rustiyah, N.K. 1991. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Sardiman, A.M. 1996. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Sukidin, dkk. 2002. Manajemen Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Surabaya: Insan Cendekia.
Suryosubroto, B. 1997. Proses Belajar Mengajar di Sekolah. Jakarta: Rineksa Cipta.
Syah, Muhibbin. 1995. Psikologi Pendidikan, Suatu Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mena (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.